Sociology is too useful to be allowed to hide in universities.
Social theories of culture: we create meaning as we interact. That means we can learn and choose to interact in ways that create different meanings from the social norms. Is that a lever for changing social norms? Still not sure, but it makes it easier to work as equal colleagues in a world that says we cannot be when we know meanings aren't fixed.
Membership categorisation: if membership categories exist, can we
play with the signifiers for categories to get ourselves put into a different
category? Conclusion: yes. We call it 'wearing the right shoes'
Ethnomethodological disruption experiments: knowing about these
takes the sting out of situations where we think we are acting normally but
others act as if we are conducting a disruption experiment. It makes us proud
to be naturally disruptive, rather than scared or angry at what had been
incomprehensible or offensive reactions to us.
Wittgenstein: why do we end up in meetings where people are using
the same words but seem to be talking at cross-purposes? Probably because we
are picturing different things as we say the word. So let's go round the room
and check what we are picturing. Job done. We know why we are talking at
cross-purposes and can do something about it.
Goffman: front stage/backstage, framing, Othering. These concepts and
language give us tools to understand and communicate effectively about how life works and in doing that, it makes it easier for everyone to see ways to play the game differently.
Post-structuralism: the relief that dividing things into two groups (binary thinking) is an idea not a
reality. This means we can escape the binary thinking that has stymied our
attempts to be ourselves in a world that wants to divide us into 'disabled' and
'normal'.
No comments:
Post a Comment