Friday 22 March 2019

Real life + organisational categories = headache


Life and organisational categories do not mix.

With policy making as with public services, you can either start with the boundaries and categories of the bureaucracy, or you can start with the lives of members of the public. There is no neat mapping of one onto the other.

In Wales, policy increasingly calls for starting with the lives of members of the public; any method of organisation of services continually frustrates this call. The significance of the call is that any policy making or public service that begins within an administrative category (eg ‘health’ or ‘social care’) is going to interpret people’s lived experience in the light of that category’s values and ways of operating. Reorganisation can never result in complete and seamless joining up of the different categories.

I do not know the solution for Wales as a whole, although having a single key worker or service coordinator as a buffer between your life and public services seems a helpful start.

In research, academic disciplines are the equivalent of organisational categories of public services and public policy-making.

If one starts with the lived experience of members of the public, there are challenges in mapping the research to an academic discipline. This is problematic if part of being an academic is to know one’s field. The researcher who begins with lived experience is forced to achieve at least entry level understanding of multiple academic fields (and be viewed as only having entry level status within that field), or gain greater depth of knowledge and understanding of fragments drawn from multiple academic fields. The alternative, as with public services, would be to challenge the premise that social life should be understood through the trammelled vision of professional, organisational or bureaucratic categories.

As a not-yet-academic, my personal challenge is this: How do I write a thesis that begins with lived experience? How do I construct and mark the boundaries of what I want to claim as my academic field? What is adequate academic knowledge for the field I am constructing? 

As a member of the public, my personal challenge is this: How do I support public services and policy making to find a way to implement their desire to make services and policies revolve around my life, rather than make my life fit into their pre-existing categories?

Monday 11 March 2019

Of elephants and ants (Part 2)

My elephant (PhD thesis) is breaking down nicely into its parts.

I have a structure for the thesis, and a narrative thread that is probably strong enough to hold the weight of the thesis. I've done first drafts of parts of it. I'm knuckling under this week to tackle my first full scale chapter - The Ethics Divide - which means rounding of a chunk of data analysis, deciding where to draw the line on the literature work (and naturally doing more reading because more has been published since I did my last search), then creating a coherent chapter.

My current problem is that the ants keep crawling everywhere.

Give yourself a whole 14 days to work on Chapter 9, I said.
Clear the decks from family and work responsibilities, I said.
Start early in the morning and remain focused, I said.

When will I learn????

  • Two non-negotiable, non-Chapter 9 deadlines have landed for this Friday.
  • I've got decisions to make about family matters.
  • My character means when I panic easily when I can't work out how the elephant fits together - which means I end up blogging, or tweeting, or on Facebook to distract myself [progress though, I'm not also compulsively eating sweet food]
  • And the influx of emails, oh the emails.


The reality of life, especially as a mature student, is that there will never be a whole 14 days to focus on one thing. I don't even get that on holiday.

What I can do is set up barriers for the ants to shield the elephant while the ants accumulate and then go eat the lot of them - at a prearranged time each day.

And I can try to discourage the ants from crawling towards my elephant in the first place (things like telling everyone in my life that I won't be playing my usual roles for 14 days then negotiate with them what roles they will pick up and what will be left undone).

I can give myself procrastination time-limits when stuck. [five minutes and I'm off twitter and blogger and back to the grindstone]

I can use the range of techniques I've got for de-panicking so I can restart focused work on Chapter 9. And today that means ignoring the elephant and enjoying the simple, effective elegance of Quirkos to re-analyse the data before tomorrow tackling the literature.

Decision made = focus restored - for now.